News
Why Did These Three Democrats Oppose Gavin's Law?
Published
5 years agoon

Gavin’s Law, the proposed legislation to enhance penalties for hit-and-run drivers, passed the Assembly floor on Monday, 66-3.
Who are the three who voted against AB 582 authored by Assemblyman Jim Patteson (R-Fresno) and named for Gavin Gladding, the Clovis Unified educator killed by a hit-and-run driver who may have fled the scene while impaired?

David Taub
Politics 101
Stone explained his vote.
“This bill is based on the unfounded premise that most drivers who leave the scene of a hit-and-run do so because they are intoxicated,” Stone said in an email. “There are other reasons why people may leave the scene of an accident. The Legislature should not impose a penalty increase based on an unproven assumption. While hit-and-runs are no doubt tragic, we should not legislate on emotions. California has worked to decrease sentencing and reduce the prison population in this state, and this bill would be counter to those efforts.”
Kamlager and Kalra declined to state their reasons for opposing the bill.
The bill now moves to the state Senate.
Gov. Gavin Newsom is not revealing his hand about whether he supports the legislation.
“As is the case with all pending legislation, if and when a bill reaches the governor’s desk it will be evaluated on its merits,” a spokesman for the governor said.
One Mayoral Forum This Week, One Postponed
Andrew Janz and Jerry Dyer will square off in one mayoral forum this week.
The Fresno Hispanic Area Foundation will host a business forum featuring the two leading candidates for Fresno’s top elected office. The event takes place Wednesday morning at Tornino’s and requires a ticket.
Shortly after this item originally published, the organizers of a second Fresno mayoral forum, set for this Thursday, postponed the event because of scheduling issues.
The new date is Feb. 13 6-8 p.m. at St. James Episcopal Church (4147 E. Dakota) in Fresno.
All seven candidates have been invited to attend.
Fresno 4 All — a collaboration of six different groups — organized the event that was to take place at Fresno City College.
As reported on Sunday Morning Matters, Dyer did not plan be there. He said he had a conflict speaking to a veterans’ group at the same time.
GV Wire hosted a televised forum between Dyer and Janz that can be seen at the link below.
[Update, 1/28/2020, 2 p.m.: this item has been updated to reflect the date change]
[rlic_related_post_one]
COS Hosts Congressional, Supervisorial Forums
Also on Thursday, several South Valley organizations will hold a forum featuring candidates for Congressional District 22 and Tulare County Supervisor District 3.
The CD 22 race features three Democrats — Phil Arballo, Dary Rezvani, Bobby Bliatout — and one candidate without a party preference — Eric Garcia — trying to unseat incumbent Devin Nunes (R-Tulare). All have been invited to attend.
The event starts 6:45 p.m. at the College of Sequoias Ponderosa Room in Visalia.
The Fresno 4 All and Visalia events are free and open to the public.
Labor Group Backs Soria Over Costa in Congressional Race
Does the endorsement mean the CLF is ditching Costa?
Not necessarily.
The CLF hasn’t endorsed Costa since 2014 —even when he ran against Republicans.
Dillon Savory, executive director of the Central Labor Council, explained that Costa “began to distance himself from labor’s top legislative policies” such as the Employee Free Choice Act and became “rigid” in support of the Affordable Care Act.
“He has continued to advocate for specific unions and policy positions — opposing the privatization of the post office and supporting prevailing wage regulations. But the bulk of our affiliated unions feel like he doesn’t care about our opinions or legislation anymore,” Savory said.
The end question is, do endorsements matter? Savory thinks so.
“Our field efforts helped save his career in both 2010 and 2014 when he faced tough opponents in non-presidential years,” Savory said.
Costa reported raising $505,633 in the fourth quarter of 2019 and $1.2 million overall, with $903,734 cash on hand. Official numbers for all candidates will be available next week. He also has the support of many elected leaders including Gov. Gavin Newsom, Sen. Kamala Harris, and Attorney General Xavier Becerra.
Proud to have received the endorsement of @CaliforniaLabor! It’s time for Valley working families to have a voice in Congress. Watch full announcement here 👉🏽 https://t.co/D66OQUafco pic.twitter.com/uMwoyRotV9
— Esmeralda Soria (@Esmeralda_Soria) January 25, 2020
David Taub has spent most of his career in journalism behind the scenes working as a TV assignment editor and radio producer. For more than a decade, he has worked in the Fresno market with such stops at KSEE-24, KMJ and Power Talk 96.7. Taub also worked the production and support side of some of TV sports biggest events including the Super Bowl, the NBA Finals and NASCAR to name a few. Taub graduated from the University of Michigan with dual degrees in communications and political science. You can contact David at 559-492-4037 or at Send an Email

You may like
-
Fresno Police Chief Hall Signs Off After 42 Years With ‘Thank You’
-
Church Purchasing Tower Theatre Threatens Lawsuit, Says LGBTQ ‘Welcome’
-
Fresno’s New Police Chief Says No Honeymoon Period. ‘Violent Crime is Number One.’
-
Costa, Harder Join With Pelosi, Want Trump Impeached
-
As Mayor, Dyer Wants to Float All Boats With Huge Economic Boom
-
What’s Next for Lee Brand, Who Quietly Made Fresno a Better City?
Doug Reid
August 8, 2020 at 1:22 pm
I love Senator STONE’s remarks. Especially this one: “The Legislature should not impose a penalty increase based on an unproven assumption.”
But what about assumptions proven wrong for over a century? I give you, for example, a cornerstone of Labor platforms, the minimum wage. For over a century the claim that a legislated minimum wage would eliminate poverty has failed to be proven, steadily. And when the opposition suggests that the minimum wage is inflationary, ineffective or doesn’t correspond with the (single) law of economics (supply and demand set prices) the furious counterattacks are, charitably, less than rational. Yet our Progressive legislature remains committed to this failed assumption and therefore backs the failed policy.
BTW, when did we decide that the state was getting out of the punishment business? If we cannot deter crime with punishment because drunk drivers “are not rational” will we also remove punishment from other criminal behavior because those criminals too are not rational? Does anyone think murder, rape or embezzlement are the products of a rational mind? These behaviors are the result of a disordered mind, defective thinking. In the past we incarcerated people who (were caught & convicted of) exhibited these behaviors for the safety of the public.